Women walking together, away from the church

Women walking together, away from the church

Article from Phyllis Zagano, originally published in the National Catholic Reporter. Phyllis is also a Papal Commissioner.

23rd September 2019

The Vatican released the participants’ list for the upcoming Synod for the Pan-Amazon Region the other day. All 185 synod votes belong to men.

There is one voting lay person: Ecuadorian Holy Family Br. Miguel Angel González Antolín, one of 15 named by the men’s Union of Superiors General. The 10 women religious nominated by the women’s International Union of Superiors General (UISG) are in the back rows, with 45 other auditors.

I get it. It is a synod of bishops, after all. But, in theory at least, superiors general of women’s religious communities are equal to bishops. Like diocesan bishops, women superiors have jurisdiction over hundreds of women and control millions of dollars in funds and property. There are some 1,500 members of the International Union of Superiors General, giving leadership to more than 650,000 women religious and overseeing genuine mercy and ministry of the living church. Yet not one is a voting member of the synod.

It was not always like this. Years ago, the abilities, intellects and legal authority of women were respected.

Until the late 19th century, there were abbesses who held absolute ecclesiastical jurisdiction over the people and lands of their territorial abbeys. These abbesses had the same authority as bishops. They gave priests faculties to hear confessions, to celebrate Mass, and to preach. They appointed chaplains and parish priests; they oversaw church legal proceedings; they ensured proper elections of religious superiors. You name it, these abbesses oversaw whatever is on your bishop’s legal plate today. For 700 years, successive popes recognized, even increased, their authority, especially in France, Italy, Spain and Sweden.

Pope Pius IX, the pope of papal infallibility and of the First Vatican Council, ended all that in 1873, with a bull entitled Quae diversa or “Differences.” The longest serving pope in history, Pius IX was elected when he was 54 and died at 85. He was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 2000, following years of controversy, during which his canonization cause was closed more than once.

Today, right-wing Catholics who prefer the church’s museum pieces, especially the Latin Mass, are stomping around in disrespectful anger at Pope Francis’ initiatives. Although Francis does not deviate from any church doctrine, they create the problems they complain about through their various blogs, websites, newspapers and television and radio outlets. For example, Francis does not “advocate” Communion for divorced, civilly remarried Catholics, but angry right-wing commentators say his pastoral approach does. Further, the extreme right seems to think the world will come to an end if a married man is ordained a Latin priest, despite the disciplinary nature of clerical celibacy and the fact of several hundred married Latin priests worldwide. As for ordaining women as deacons, don’t even go there. The right wing ignores the historically documented sacramental ordinations of women deacons, the liturgies used, the literary evidence, even the tombstones using their title: deacon.

Underneath all the fire and smoke simmers a blatant misogyny inherited from the right’s imaginings that the way it was is the way it should be. The misogyny is real. History records popes and bishops railing against women at the altar with the same reasoning they used against married priests: women are unclean and cannot be near the sacred. Plus, women are stupid. (The 13th-century Italian canonist Bernard of Botone opined that women could not be excommunicated because they were too stupid to understand the law)

Do church men still believe that?

To be sure, the large portion of men attending the synod as voting members, auditors or experts are finely educated, interesting people. But moneyed far-right drums must beat loudly in their ears. Women deacons? Married priests? Each a good idea to provide for the needs of the church in South America and around the world. Each a point of near hysteria for these minor but very loud voices.

The church could very well be near a breaking point. The Catholic right is already in schism where it denies the teaching authority of the pope. Yet if both women deacons and married priests are not recommended by the synod, it could be game over.

The schism to worry about is the one where all the women leave the church.

[Phyllis Zagano is senior research associate-in-residence at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. She will speak Oct. 22 at Fordham University’s Lincoln Center Campus in New York. Her books include Women Deacons: Past, Present, Future, published in France and Canada as Des femmes diacres and in Portugal as Mulheres diáconos: Passado, presente, futuro. Study Guides are available for free download at https://sites.hofstra.edu/phyllis-zagano/.]

Photo credit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Church_pews,_Old_Brick_Church,_Mooresville,_AL,_image_by_Marjorie_Kaufman_01.jpg)



  1. Mel Ward September 30, 2019 at 10:46 pm - Reply

    What is wrong with their basic grasp of the gospel that all humanity is loved, respected, sought and saved?
    These synods could be a great opportunity to include wise, well educated and widely experienced laity.
    Do we really believe that when we finally face God we will not have the scales of division fall from our eyes and the shame of hindering the kingdom wilfully and mean heartedly.
    What do they fear? Certainly it is not God.
    We need to stop training priests in outdated boy’s own boarding schools and start opening channels of genuine love, respect and communication.
    Whatever plan God has for us as a human family and regardless of whether or not women should be ordained, we need to open our hearts and minds to the glorious reality and gifts of every person. I have been teaching young women for 30 years. The church does not seem to really want them-only their husks and shadows.

  2. Christine Halfpenny January 30, 2020 at 10:51 am - Reply


    Is there any place in church for me?
    In a church that does not see me? Or recognise my different gifts.
    A church that does not care for me.
    How do I grow when no-one hears me?
    Who helps me grow?
    We should BE the church, but we are not allowed.
    Only men are allowed. We just attend and serve.
    I am allowed to contribute by serving tea and cake.
    The Martha who arranges flowers, polishes the pews, and sings in the choir.
    I mind the children.
    All important, but not a position from which we can discuss change.
    I am not able or encouraged to engage with power.
    Even the language excludes me.
    That’s not only sad, but foolish.
    You can’t build the future of church with only half the people.
    A death spiral of ever decreasing involvement just won’t do it.
    Being the church has something to do with living your life for Christ.
    Doesn’t it?
    Sharing your faith with others.
    But I am a consumer of, not a contributor to my faith.
    Jesus said ‘Follow me’, ‘Who do you say that I am.?’
    There is plenty there to explore.
    But in a living church that includes the voices of women as well as men

Leave A Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Support our work

Please support the work of the Catholic Women Speak Network - helping to create the space for authentic dialogue within the Church. Find out what your funds can help us achieve. Find out what your funds can help us achieve.
Donate here